News & Information

 

FEATURED PRODUCT

5500 Preparer's Manual for 2012 Plan Years
The premier resource in the field of Form 5500 preparation, 5500 Preparer's Manual will help you handle the required annual Form 5500 filings for both pension benefits and welfare benefit plans.

Learn More »

CCH® PENSION AND BENEFITS — 04/20/09

EBRI Finds That Public Pension Plan Deficits Are Growing

from Spencer’s Benefits Reports: According to a recent analysis by the Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI), under current accounting rules, underfunded public pension plan sponsors face some incentives to maintain aggressive or risky investments and public plan sponsors are unlikely to significantly shift toward safer but lower-return investment policies, at least in the short run. The analysis appears in the April 2009 issue of EBRI Notes.

Investment losses from the current recession have significantly eroded the funding status of public pension plans, affecting entities from school districts and local and state governments, and there is growing concern that increasing deficits in public plans will force taxpayers to make up for the shortfall.

According to the EBRI analysis, public pension funding relies on three sources: earnings from investments, employer (taxpayer) contributions, and worker contributions. Of the three sources, investment income typically has been the most important, especially since court rulings have limited the ability of pension plan sponsors to increase worker contributions.

Under current rules adopted by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB), public plan sponsors face at least two incentives to maintain aggressive investment policies:

(1) Actuarial funding methods project higher investment income for risky asset allocations than what is assumed under more conservative investment strategies. Without that income, plan sponsors with underfunded plans would have to make higher contributions to fund the projected shortfalls in their plans.

(2) Public plan sponsors that want to use a high discount rate (to minimize their pension liabilities) have an incentive to maintain high-return/high-risk asset allocation strategies; under current accounting practices, a high expected rate of return can be used to lower stated plan liabilities.

Moving to lower-return but less volatile investments would increase the stated unfunded pension liability in public pension plans and thus require additional employer contributions. However, the EBRI analysis concludes that this might be necessary both to address the current economic reality facing public plans and to avoid the need for even greater taxpayer-financed contributions in the future.

For more information, visit http://www.ebri.org.

Visit our News Library to read more news stories.